| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| MOLE FRACTION |
AIR HUMIDITY |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| MOLE
FRACTION IN GASEOUS PHASE |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Quantity - mole fraction of component in gas mixture
|
| |
Unit
- mol/mol. |
| |
Tasks
|
| |
|
|
The main
task is the realisation of mole fraction scale for different gas mixtures
and its transfer into gas reference materials.
|
| |
International
comparisons
| year |
comparison |
type
of comparison |
subject
of comparison |
| 1998 |
CCQM
K3 |
key |
CO, CO2, propane in nitrogen |
| 2000 |
EUROMET
485 |
key |
CO,
CO2, propane in nitrogen |
| 2000 |
CCQM
P23 |
supplementary |
3
mixtures of CO in nitrogen |
| 2001 |
EUROMET
580 |
key |
ethanol
in air |
| 2001 |
CCQM
K16 |
key |
natural
gas |
Euromet
485 results:
Measured
component in
CRM of CO, CO2, propane in N2 |
measured
mole fraction
mmol/mol |
relative
difference from reference value |
| carbon
monoxide |
31.030
|
0.046
% |
| carbon
dioxide |
132.05
|
0.020
% |
| propane |
2.090 |
0.22
% |
Euromet 580 results:
| Measured
component in
CRM of
ethanol in air |
measured
mole fraction
µmol/mol |
relative
difference from reference value |
| etanol |
118.88 |
0.17
% |
CCQM K16 results:
| Measured
component in CRM of natural
gas |
measured
mole fraction
mmol/mol |
relative
difference from reference value |
measured
mole fraction
mmol/mol |
relative
difference from reference value |
methane |
820.8 |
0.49
% |
817.9 |
-
0.46 % |
ethane |
7.570 |
1.1
% |
109.72 |
-
0.34 % |
propane |
2.9432 |
0.99
% |
44.780 |
-
0.35 % |
n-butane |
2.0309 |
0.24
% |
0.9832 |
-
0.86 % |
iso-butane |
2.0334 |
0.84
% |
0.9974 |
-
0.39 % |
n-pentane |
0.5035 |
1.1
% |
0.3469 |
0.44
% |
iso-pentane |
0.4890 |
0.60
% |
0.3452 |
-
0.04 % |
neopentane |
0.512 |
3.0
% |
0.511 |
2.2
% |
n-hexane |
0.5060 |
-
0.02 % |
0.1963 |
-
0.48 % |
nitrogen |
121.45 |
0.20
% |
11.91 |
-
0.35 % |
CO2 |
40.60 |
0.38
% |
7.953 |
-
0.11 % |
|
| |
|
 |
Available
metrological services |
| |
|
|
- verification
tests and type approvals of cehicle exhaust emissions gas analysers
- verification tests and type approvals of breath analysers
- preparation of primary RM of gas mixture for sale
- certification measurement of RM of gas mixtures
|
| |
|
|
| Gas mixture |
Component |
Mole fraction range of component
in PRM / in measured gas mixture |
Expanded uncertainties of
certified mole fraction (k=2), % rel. |
| mmol/mol |
in PRM |
in gas mixture analysed at SMU |
| from |
to |
from |
to |
from |
to |
| CO2
in N2 |
CO2 |
10 |
180 |
0.20 |
0.15 |
0.30 |
0.25 |
| CO
in N2 |
CO |
8 |
100 |
0.20 |
0.15 |
0.30 |
0.25 |
| propane
in N2 |
propane |
0.1 |
10 |
0.30 |
0.20 |
0.60 |
0.50 |
CO,
CO2, propane
in N2 |
CO2 |
60 |
140 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.35 |
0.30 |
| CO |
5 |
35 |
0.30 |
0.25 |
0.90 |
0.35 |
| propane |
0.1 |
2 |
0.40 |
0.40 |
1.0 |
0.60 |
| ethanol
in N2/air |
ethanol |
0.075 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
| natural
gas |
methane |
650 |
990 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
| ethane |
2.5
|
90 |
0.25 |
0.20 |
1.1 |
0.40 |
| propane |
1 |
100 |
0.35 |
0.25 |
1.0 |
0.40 |
| n-butane |
0.3 |
7 |
0.50 |
0.30 |
0.90 |
0.50 |
| iso-butane |
0.3 |
7 |
0.50 |
0.30 |
0.90 |
0.90 |
| n-pentane |
0.2 |
3 |
0.50 |
0.40 |
1.1 |
0.60 |
| iso-pentane |
0.2 |
3 |
0.50 |
0.40 |
0.80 |
0.40 |
| n-hexane |
0.2 |
2 |
1.0 |
0.50 |
1.1 |
0.60 |
| CO2 |
2 |
170 |
0.35 |
0.20 |
0.95 |
0.25 |
| N2 |
1 |
140 |
0.30 |
0.20 |
0.50 |
0.30 |
|
| |
Methods of measurement: |
| |
|
|
Preparation
of PRM of gas mixtures is based on keeping the newest ISO standards:
ISO 6142 (2001) gas analysis - preparation of calibration gas mixtures
- Gravimetric method and ISO 6143 (2001) Gas analysis - determination
of the composition of calibration gas mixtures - Comparison methods.
Each PRM undergoes validation process in analytical comparison against
maintained appropriate set of PRMs at SMU. Cylinders (5 L volume) used
for PRMs fulfil the highest requirements for gas mixture stability.
SMU provides 2 years stability guarantee for most of its gaseous PRMs. All certification
measurements of gas mixtures consist of several automatic comparisons
against maintained appropriate set of PRMs at SMU.
|